Group blog

« Some consolation | Main | But who will surveil the surveillants? »




I didn't see the speech. Paul has a good response: why talk about the speech when we should be talking about impeachment? He went to war under false pretenses and is breaking the law with his secret surveillance. These are illegal acts.


Oh, by the way, my comment didn't mean that folks shouldn't talk about the SOU, it was more a polemical point.


Polemical point taken . . . In fact, per your suggestion at Long Sunday, I'll probably go back to blogging philosophy -- something even less relevant than the SOTU . . .

The comments to this entry are closed.